Pallone: Christie, sign sports betting bill

Share
Pre-Reveal Sweepstakes

Pre-Reveal Sweepstakes

TRENTON, N.J.- Representative Frank Pallone Jr. (D-6) along with the supporters of sports betting in New Jersey called on Gov. Chris Christie to sign the bill which was already passed at the state legislature the soonest possible time.

“I continue to believe that New Jersey should be given the same opportunity that other states have already been given with regards to gaming in their states and that the federal government should not stand in the way. I urge Governor Christie to sign this bill quickly and bring sports wagering to New Jersey,” Pallone stated during a press release.

According to Pallone, the citizens of New Jersey had spoken loud and clear that they want the opportunity to share in the profits from professional sports betting.

Recently, the Federal Court of Philadelphia voted against sports betting in NJ concluding that the proposal is not in line with the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act passed by the Congress in 1992.

Based on the law, all states but Nevada, Monatana, Delaware and Oregon, are not allowed to bet on any sports. Only those four states are exempted from the law because they already allow gambling on sports before the bill was ratified.

In 2013, Pallone along with Congressman Frank LoBiondo (R-NJ) proposed a bipartisan bill that provides an exemption for New Jersey to the federal law prohibiting sports betting.

Under the bill passed by the state Legislature, sports wagering could be allowed at the Monmouth Park Racetrack in Pallone’s district. If approved this will potentially attracting hundreds of visitors to the area and thousands in new revenue for surrounding businesses.

Comments

comments

Powered by Facebook Comments

Live Nation partners with BetfairCasino.com for online gaming sponsor

Share
Pre-Reveal Sweepstakes

Pre-Reveal Sweepstakes

JERSEY CITY, N.J. – BetfairCasino.com, one of the world’s largest Internet betting exchange announced last week that it is now the official online gaming sponsor for Live Nation New Jersey.

Betfair, though based in London was the online gaming partner of Atlantic City’s Trump Plaza.

The deal with Live Nation New Jersey, the operator of PNC Bank Arts Center in Holmdel and Susquehanna Bank Center in Camden will allow Betfair patrons to earn Live Nation® Concert Cash® or Ticketmaster Ticket Cash for future events in Holmdel and Camden upon making their first-deposit to an eligible account.

“We are excited to be able to work with venues like PNC Bank Arts Center and Susquehanna Bank Center on this great program to introduce thrill-seeking music fans in New Jersey to Betfair with a unique and engaging experience both online and onsite,” told Senior VP Don Ryan, of Gaming at Betfair US and GM of Betfair.

Ryan added that “the rush of seeing your favorite artist or band live is something we find very synergistic to the rush of playing your favorite casino games online – anytime and anywhere in New Jersey.”

Meanwhile, Live Nation was pleased with the sponsorship.

“We are pleased to have the opportunity to engage with New Jersey’s online gaming consumers through this marketing sponsorship with BetfairCasino.com. We know these are people who like to have fun, and the Live Nation Concert Cash and Ticketmaster Ticket Cash promotions are a great way to get folks out to fantastic concerts at amazing music venues in the Garden State,” said Senior VP Andy Peikon of Live Nation.

Comments

comments

Powered by Facebook Comments

Sweepstakes Owners Subject To Paying Fees

Share

Managers of Internet sweepstakes cafes are showing interest in Salisbury, and City Council agreed Tuesday the gaming companies will definitely not profit from a business license fee waiver authorized this summer.

877-WIN-CAFE Sweepstakes Games

Previously this year, the N.C. Court of Appeals considered sweepstakes legal and ruled that a state law aimed at closing the companies broke the First Amendment.


Since then, the city’s new one-stop shop for development has caught many requests concerning starting sweepstakes cafes.

City Manager Doug Paris proposed City Council make clear that electronic gaming machines are not exempt from business license fees. The city charges $ 500 every machine yet may raise that amount after comparing the cost next month with additional districts, some of which cost thousands of bucks for each machine.

Council members in June authorized waiving business license costs for one year to promote new progression in the city. However when they gave the waiver, Internet gaming machines were still prohibited under state law.

So the council on Tuesday passed a determination exempting electronic gaming machines from the one-year fee moratorium.

By waiving the fee, Salisbury would definitely have been a place for sweepstakes cafes to stay clear of the higher fees in additional metros, Councilman Brian Miller claimed.

“This corrects an unintended loophole,” he claimed.

Councilwoman Maggie Blackwell talked to city personnel to prep a contrast of fees in different metros so council members can identify if Salisbury is undercharging.

Miller will function as council liaison.

Paris recommended the county’s new structure examination director could serve on the committee.

“I would throw this away, but you would charge me $ 7 for a collection fee,” he pointed out.

Salisbury homeowners are paying new charges of $ 7 a month for garbage and $ 4.25 a month for stormwater.

Mayor Paul Woodson requested that Paris meet Clyde.

Comments

comments

Powered by Facebook Comments

What Does The Prospect Of The Online Casino Industry Have On The Politics Of Internet Sweepstakes Debate.

Share

The picture of a player dropping money into a computer game evokes memories for numerous South Carolinians, positive as well as negative.

Currently, sweepstakes machines are increasing rapidly in Internet cafes and additional places throughout the state.

In the course of video poker’s prime, patrons played for hours, wishing for a monetary payout. Players currently collect and redeem credits on sweepstakes machines for products such as phone cards. The dispute emerges when operators redeem the credits for money.

Don Patel, owner of River’s Country Store in Santee, has actually had sweepstakes machines for 6 months. He stated the income aids his outlet’s profit, however he is ready to remove one or more.

“It’s not crazy money– a couple of dollarrs,” Patel pointed out. “Players can play them to get a phone calling card but we give gift cards.

“I don’t give cash. That is not allowed. They don’t come and play them as much when they find I’m not paying out cash.”

Bamberg’s Brabham Oil Company spokesman Brad McCully pointed out the business decided not to run the machines at its 27 Horizon E-Z Shop stations in The T&D area.

“It reminds us of the video poker path,” McCully pointed out. “That came in under the radar and it reminds me of it happening all over again.

“If enough of my competitors do it, I will be forced to do it because they will use the proceeds from the sweepstakes machines to sell staple items at cost. It provides an uneven playing field for the consumer and I hate to see that happen again.”

Reflecting the dispute that led to video poker’s extermination in 2000, battle lines are once more being drawn over sweepstakes machines.

The battle extends to the South Carolina General Assembly, where legislation stating sweepstakes machines illegal died this year. One lawmaker seeking to outlaw them is state Sen. Larry Martin, R-Pickens, who called the machines “video poker 2.0.” He plans to reintroduce legislation next year to remove them.

State Sen. Brad Hutto, D-Orangeburg, points out the machines are not unlawful and the state should put regulations in place and tax the earnings.

“The courts will have a difficult time declaring them illegal,” Hutto stated. “North Carolina and Georgia have already litigated this and found them legal.

“We can’t let it get out of hand like many say video poker did. The state should get license fees and taxes in place. That is the reasonable solution.”

Sweepstakes supporters say an exemption in state law permits convenience store operators with a beer and wine license to operate the machines.

The exemption permits game special offers consisting of “contests, games of chance, or sweepstakes” entailing the sale, special offer or advertising campaign of a customer services or product.

The major rivals are S.C. Attorney General Alan Wilson and the State Law Enforcement Division. They point out the exemption does not pertain to video sweepstakes.

SLED Chief Mark Keel stated his company’s bold suppression on the machines is based on grievances from county sheriffs.

“When I came back in July 2011, one of the first things was numerous calls from chiefs of police, sheriffs and legislators all saying they wanted it stopped,” Keel pointed out.” (Wilson) had a number of opinions on the machines. We met on it and believe they are in violation of current statute.”

He added, “650 machines have been seized since March. We haven’t lost a case yet that we started. I don’t think we have had any sheriff or chiefs who don’t buy into what we’re doing.”

Advocates are retaliating. One Sumter Internet sweepstakes operator declares his civil liberties were breached when SLED and the Sumter County Sheriff confiscated the machines and shut his business.

Calhoun County Sheriff Thomas Summers said he has not had a solitary grievance concerning sweepstakes machines however is “following the lead of the higher powers” on the concern.

“If SLED and the Solicitor’s Office said they will prosecute on this, I will cooperate with them,” Summers stated. “There may be sweepstakes machines operating in Calhoun County but I don’t know anything about them.

“We’ve been waiting on rulings that would give us the definite go-ahead on this and that’s basically where we stand.”

In a June 2011 legal viewpoint, Wilson indicated he can not settle the legality or illegality of a specific machine. Having said that, any machine simulating the game of poker, restricted by state law, makes the device prohibited.

“It is also our opinion that any machine which contains a game or games prohibited by (state statute) is illegal per se, notwithstanding the existence of other games which also might be programmed for play on the same machine,” the point of view read.

The courts have actually added to the confusion. In numerous magistrate court confiscation hearings throughout South Carolina, sweepstakes machines have been ruled both legal and unlawful.

On Jan. 27, 13th Circuit Court Judge D. Garrison Hill in Greenville maintained a magistrate that ruled the machines were legal. That has since been annulled and remanded back to the lesser court “for further factual development of the record.”

First Circuit Solicitor David Pascoe recently told SLED he will definitely approve the prosecution of sweepstakes machine cases it makes. He stated the epitome of the concern seems to be how sweepstakes machines are played.

“Some operators say they are no different than McDonald’s and its game promotions, like Monopoly,” Pascoe stated. “The difference is if you buy a cheeseburger and play the McDonald’s game, you don’t get to turn it in and get your money.”

Comments

comments

Powered by Facebook Comments

Legality still under question but operators ‘sure they’re OK’

Share

Legality still under question but operators ‘sure they’re OK’

The number of Ector County gaming facilities providing opportunities to play sweepstakes that simulate video slots has more than doubled in six months — and the owners say they believe they’re providing legal entertainment that doesn’t violate Texas’ gambling statutes despite allowing the players to win cash.

As law enforcement familiarizes itself with the new facilities and as county and district attorneys debate the enterprises’ legality, different companies are bringing in the game facilities under sweepstakes laws that allow companies to run charity promotions that award prizes similar to what McDonald’s does each year with its Monopoly game.

New facilities have opened up at 46th Street and Andrews Highway, on 61st Street, on University Boulevard and Grandview Avenue, and on West County Road among other locations.

“We were so busy and all of the sudden it died,” said Karen Watkins, who works at Vegas Lights on Andrews Highway, an established eight-liner game facility that legally cannot give out cash but awards more playing time to successful players. “I can’t believe how they just popped up.”

While it appears similar to the entertainment eight-liners provide, the owners and operators said it’s com-pletely different. They’re not eight-liners, which have countless times been proven to be illegal in Texas if used for gambling purposes. Sweepstakes machines provide an entertaining way to reveal the sweepstakes entry.

“It may look like a duck and walk like a duck, (but) nope, it’s just a fun way of doing things,” Leo Nathan, district manager for Texas E-Store, a sweepstakes com-pany, said.

Texas E-Stores provides the online charity sweepstakes fund-raising to the local Veterans of Foreign Wars.

A person can donate money to the VFW by entering a sweepstakes for various prizes, Billy Boone, attorney for Texas E Stores, said. Much like McDonald’s Monopoly game, no purchase is necessary for a free entry and all entries, if purchased through a donation to the VFW or not, have an equal chance of winning.

The sweepstakes entries assigns a number that is predetermined as a winner or not, Boone said. The online game merely simulates if the entry won or not through noise and graphics much like a video slot machine or even video poker. If the participant does win, they can walk out of the “donation station” gaming facility with cash.

The VFW sweepstakes complies with all state and federal sweepstakes laws, and the software has been certified by Nick Farley, an Ohio-based gaming expert, Boone said. The sweepstakes are no different than what the American Association of State Troopers Scholarship Foundation, the American Breast Cancer Foundation and U.S. Municipal Police Association conduct, Boone assured.

Boone wouldn’t disclose the percentage of the proceeds that are donated to the VFW, though Nathan said it’s about $3,000 to $5,000 a week.

At Reno Lights, another company that provides a sweepstakes game, owner Robert Babcock said he gives 5 percent of his proceeds to the Crisis Center, a local abuse counseling nonprofit organization.

Babcock’s Reno Lights provides Internet service, he said, and the people who use it can play for the sweepstakes prizes if they choose to.

They, too, are al-lowed limited free entry into the sweepstakes through a website called hello-money.com.

For now, the companies appear to be providing a legal service that isn’t gambling, Ector County Attorney Cathy Linch said. Because a person is allowed to enter the sweepstakes for free and the person with a free entry has an equal chance of winning as someone who donates, then it’s not gambling because the participant doesn’t have to pay to be considered for the prize.

“You don’t want to go after somebody if you’re not convinced it’s illegal,” Linch said.

County and district attorneys across the state have been receiving information packets from Texas E-Stores lawyers that contain sweepstakes expert’s opinion, a federal lawsuit that shows the sweepstakes legitimacy and other information sheets that explain the difference between eight-liners and sweepstakes run through computer software. Boone said the counties receiving the information packets are prospective locations for more Texas E-Store sweepstakes facilities associated with the VFW.

“We want to be a long-term player,” Boone said. “I think district attorneys and county attorneys would agree that they never had eight-liner people send them packets and expert reports like that before and send it ahead of time,” Boone said.

Andrews County Attorney John Pool received the packet about a month ago. He continues to investigate the new sweepstakes method, he said — and hasn’t come to a conclusion

“I’m a veteran,” he said. “We want (the VFW) to be successful, but it needs to be legal what they’re doing. As long as it’s legal, I don’t have a problem.”

The Odessa Police Department’s narcotics and vice department conducts about two sweeps a year of gaming facilities, Odessa police detective Cpl. Jesse Garcia said.

Along with Linch, Odessa detectives are trying to determine the legality of facilities despite what the gaming operators ensure is legal. No one has complained about the recent boom in gaming centers, he said.

While no criminal prosecution has been taken against the local facilities, Boone will pursue a civil lawsuit soon on Texas E-Store’s behalf, against competitors who’ve opened up using different software that’s not certified and what their experts believe is eight-liner style games operating under sweepstakes laws — which is deceptive and unfair competition, he said.

Regardless, owners maintain their businesses are legal, said Carolyn Hendrick, who enjoys the eight-liner style games and plays them for playbacks at Vegas Lights. She won’t use the sweepstakes facilities, fearing law enforcement raids reminiscent of the eight-liner facility busts the Texas Department of Public Safety started in the late 1990s.

Plus, she questions where the money goes and how much is actually for charity and how much is actually profit for the facility providers.

Hendrick experienced a raid while playing in an An-drews County store, and she doesn’t want to feel the fear again. They took her picture and kept her hours after the facility was shut down. She wasn’t charged with a crime, she said, but it was enough for Hendrick to hold out on the new style machines.

“Better safe than sorry,” she said.

http://www.oaoa.com/news/sweepstakes…ies-boone.html

SOURCE

Comments

comments

Powered by Facebook Comments